|
|
|||||
|
The representatives from the Ministry of Planning and Investment (MPI), Government of Vietnam, illustrated the struggle to generate concensus on a Project Design presented during the Training of Facilitators workshop, held in Manila, Philippines (27 June – 6 July 2011). Which is better: Bilateral or Multilateral Aid? Who among the donors deliver “good” aid? Who are the worst performers? These and many other related questions were the reasons for the Center for Global Development and the Brookings Institution’s Global Economy and Development program to do the Quality of Official Development Assistance (QuODA) assessment. QuODA is a new tool that tracks and compares donor programs against four dimensions of aid quality. Aid quality is assessed using 30 indicators grouped in four dimensions that reflect the international consensus of what constitutes high-quality aid. The four dimensions are: maximizing efficiency, fostering institutions, reducing burden, and transparency and learning. More on Quality of Development Assistance: How Donors Stack Up?
A training workshop in Results-focused Project Design and Management has been delivered for 27 Vietnamese participants The participants were trained in different tools used in the conduct of participatory planning and management, including stakeholders analysis, problem and objectives tree analysis, and the results chain. The active participation by the trainees showed their keen interest to truly learn and practically apply the processes in their respective projects. The workshop successfully closes today with 25 Vietnamese public servants earning not just certificates but more importantly, valuable knowledge and skills they can use to ensure good project design and ultimately project success. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
sending...
